December 16th, 2008 by Andrew

Yeah. Yep.

Yeah.

October 21st, 2008 by Andrew

This is Abra­ham Maslow’s Hier­ar­chy of Human Needs. I think it’s a mar­velous approach to self-improvement. It was a hand­out in my Literature-based Research class, but I’ve learned that it embod­ies the human­ist school of psy­chol­ogy, which Maslow founded.

  1. Phys­i­o­log­i­cal: the need to sat­isfy hunger, thirst, and other bod­ily preoccupations.
  2. Safety/security: the need to be out of danger.
  3. Belong­ing­ness: the need for affil­i­a­tion with oth­ers, a sense of being loved or accepted.
  4. Esteem: the need to gain approval and recognition.
  5. Cog­ni­tive: the need to know, to under­stand, to explore
  6. Aes­thetic: the need for sym­me­try, order and beauty.
  7. Self-actualization: the need to expe­ri­ence self ful­fill­ment, to real­ize one’s full poten­tial. The self actu­al­iz­ing per­son is one who is:
    • Not afraid of the unknown and can tol­er­ate doubt, uncer­tainty, and ten­ta­tive­ness that accom­pany the per­cep­tion of the new and unfamiliar.
    • Not ashamed of his/her human nature with its short­com­ings, imper­fec­tions, frail­ties, and weaknesses.
    • Not ham­pered by con­ven­tions but does not flout con­ven­tions merely for the sake of doing so.
    • Missioned-oriented on the basis of an unco­erced sense of respon­si­bil­ity, duty, or obligation.
    • Respect­ful of oth­ers and tries to under­stand their perspectives.
    • Attuned to the oppor­tu­ni­ties of soli­tude and pri­vacy as well as of social interaction.
    • Fully con­scious of per­sonal respon­si­bil­ity for actions and for growth, not blam­ing oth­ers or charg­ing oth­ers with the task motivation.
    • In awe of the won­der of the every­day world and of life’s lim­it­less possibilities.
    • Pos­sessed of a deep and uncon­di­tional empa­thy for human beings in general.
    • Hum­ble in his/her recog­ni­tion of what he/she knows in com­par­i­son to what could be known and acknowl­edges oth­ers as teach­ers, respect­ing every­one as a poten­tial con­trib­u­tor to his/her knowledge.
    • Highly eth­i­cal and at least intu­itively aware of Kant’s famous cat­e­gor­i­cal imper­a­tive, which charges us to “Act only accord­ing to prin­ci­ples which we can will also to be uni­ver­sal laws.”
    • Philo­soph­i­cal and pos­sessed of an unhos­tile sense of humor
    • Vision­ary but not inclined to impose his/her beliefs on others.
    • Alive!
    1. Self-transcendence: the need to con­nect to some­thing beyond the self and to move toward a mean­ing­ful self­less­ness through that connectedness.
    Maybe this is old news for some, but it’s given me plenty to think about.

    September 1st, 2008 by Andrew

    In my anthro­pol­ogy class last week, this ques­tion was raised: Why did God put the Tree with For­bid­den Fruit in the Gar­den of Eden? The ques­tion was raised but not answered by either the the­ist or athe­ist con­tin­gent. I find this to be an impor­tant mat­ter in under­stand­ing the bible, and i have rarely heard it explained.  I ven­ture this argument:

    The bible has a con­vo­luted rela­tion­ship with the notion of man’s free will, but in this case is clear. With­out God’s plac­ing some kind of pro­hi­bi­tion that could be bro­ken, thereby gen­er­at­ing dis­obe­di­ence, their could be no chance to demon­strate choice and free will. Essen­tially, just like any good sci­en­tist, God allowed for a neg­a­tive out­come, know­ing the results would be mean­ing­less with­out the pos­si­bil­ity. It would be like vot­ing for pres­i­dent with only one name on the ballot.

    I feel that this is a rarely artic­u­lated con­cept. Any­one heard it put this way before? Where did you hear it?

    May 17th, 2008 by Andrew

    After much con­sid­er­a­tion into mat­ter psy­cho­log­i­cal, spir­i­tual and phys­i­o­log­i­cal, I have reached a con­clu­sion that has given me a per­spec­tive that I find to be a breath­tak­ing cor­rec­tion. I read Oliver Sacks Musi­cophila last year (my seri­ous first brush with neu­ro­science) and those seeds slowly ger­mi­nated until a cou­ple weeks ago, when I had an intense soul search­ing adven­ture. As suc­cinctly as I can, I will state it below:

    The mind is not a sys­tem con­structed of abil­i­ties and learned behav­iors that can be aug­mented, but rather a col­lec­tion of inhi­bi­tions and bar­ri­ers that can be sys­tem­at­i­cally removed.

    This may not be rev­o­lu­tion­ary to some peo­ple, but in some strange way this rev­e­la­tion has given me a great amount of relief and hope. Can any­one per­haps com­pare this to an exist­ing phi­los­o­phy? I’m not aware of any, and this idea seems new to me, but I’m sure some­one else has got­ten here cen­turies ago. Not that I would have liked to have been told about prior to now, for I feel that arriv­ing at it on my own makes for a supe­rior mor­tar in my mind.

    February 27th, 2008 by Andrew

    About a month ago I got a new job here in Asheville, and I’m really dig­ging it. I’d been at the news­pa­per for going on 9 years (since I was 16) and felt that I was really begin­ning to stag­nate in my knowl­edge and in my habits. My mind was con­stantly about 5 years ahead of what we could actu­ally do, and that depressed me into a kind of chronic stupor.

    In my new job, I have already learned things that I had tried to teach myself for years.  I’m begin­ning to learn web design, and to under­stand the skele­ton and flesh and blood of mar­ket­ing.  Other than more money (which can make anyone’s life eas­ier) I feel like I’ve finally got my ducks in a row and some crit­i­cal mis­takes are out of the way. Maybe grow­ing up is just find­ing out that you like to work more than you like to play. That def­i­n­i­tion will work for now.

    February 14th, 2007 by Andrew

    After recently turn­ing 24, I thought it might be an inter­est­ing to project to doc­u­ment what­ever wis­dom I have recently acquired so as to com­pare year to year now what I was see­ing, but how I was see­ing it. The nature of these are var­ied, but that is to be expected; I’m less and less fond of boxes and labels. Here is a by no means com­plete list.

    • Smok­ing in the bath­tub is per­fectly safe, except for the cancer.
    • Some mis­takes are eas­ier done than said.
    • Most peo­ple have good inten­tions and lousy meth­ods. Be quick to sup­port them with bet­ter meth­ods, and quick to con­demn those with truly poor intentions.
    • Every­one has their drug of choice. The main types are: Caf­feine, Nico­tine, Mar­i­huana, Cocaine, or Jesus.

    This should be a good tra­di­tion; I think it would be healthy for me to remem­ber what I’ve learned from year to year.

    November 21st, 2006 by Andrew

    Sesam­strasse; Just in case you won­dered whether this ever existed.

    The real point of this post:

    Recent dis­cov­er­ies and accomplishments:

    • Some of Emily Dickinson’s poems are absolutely ter­ri­ble. These, how­ever make excel­lent country/gospel tunes; “If I could stop one heart from break­ing,” is a good example.
    • Auto­di­dact
    • The Tale of Genji
    • Red Gui­tar
    • The Big Lebowski
    • Hil­los­o­phy” (folk wis­dom, e.g. )
    • Get­ting out of debt — the hard way.
    • Pur­chase of a Vic­trola! A 1921 VV-50, cur­rently on lay­away. Suit­case model.
    • Finally acknowl­edg­ing my inher­ent mate­ri­al­ism, and stag­ing a per­sonal revolution.
    • Deduced the dif­fer­ence between kern­ing and track­ing by acci­dent when some­one asked me what it was.

    Do your chil­dren enjoy jazz music? For I am here to tell you that Cab Cal­loway, Dizzy Gille­spie, Duke Elling­ton and the whole weed-blowing, ginger-colored lot are merely mas­querad­ing as musi­cians and are in fact agents of evil. Reefer slows down the smok­ers’ sense of time, allow­ing them to squeeze in unnec­es­sary “grace notes”, giv­ing this voodoo music the power to hyp­no­tize white women into indulging in unspeak­able acts of degradation.”