November 30th, 2005 by Andrew

Rums­feld: Don’t call it an ‘insurgency’

My first thought on read­ing this is a quote I saw the other day.

“You can’t make up any­thing any­more. The world itself is a satire. All you’re doing is record­ing it.” — Art Buchwald

My sec­ond thought? GW, Laura Bush, and Rums­feld all made the news today, all high­light­ing Iraq, all with pre­cise and rosy lan­guage. This is really the PR equiv­a­lent of a blitzkrieg. Whereas Clin­ton stayed on the strate­gic defen­sive at many times, the Bush Admin­is­tra­tion seems to favor a more heavy-handed approach; swamp the media with a carbon-copy mes­sage and flood out the com­pe­ti­tion. It’s bril­liant, really, and it has worked remark­ably well for remark­ably long. They have been able to put an excel­lent pub­lic face on quite a few seri­ous and seri­ously impo­lite issues; tor­ture, intel­li­gence skew­ing and out­right fail­ures, the UN ambas­sador (Who seems to have been made impo­tent by the con­tro­versy sur­round­ing his appoint­ment), the mount­ing num­ber of casu­al­ties, the lack of a clear plan in Iraq, the fail­ure to catch bin Laden (who has killed many many more Amer­i­cans then Sad­dam did both times we invaded HIS coun­try), the injus­tice treat­ment of the Guan­tanamo pris­on­ers, et cetera.

We for­get that eco­nomic pros­per­ity and and a demo­c­ra­t­i­cally elected leader are not shoe-ins for the moral high ground. His­tory is full of cor­rupt lead­ers put in place by a will­ing vot­ing pop­u­la­tion who pros­pered under the new régime, Hitler fore­most among them. The ‘right’ line is a thin line, and many before have failed it, but a leader must rec­og­nize that might often makes wrong.

Need­less to say, the real losers in this story are the Iraqi peo­ple. What can these press releases read like to them? It must be a sick joke for many and a cruel dream for the rest. Sixty-two per­cent of the Amer­i­can pub­lic now dis­ap­prove of the Bush administration’s han­dling of Iraq and I can only imag­ine that the num­bers in Iraq are higher (I’m sure they mind being killed much more then we mind killing them.) Make no mis­take, I am no revi­sion­ist; Sad­dam was ter­ri­ble. But what have we done to show we’re bet­ter? I agree with the ‘You break it, you bought it’ sentiment.

Unfor­tu­nately, the ‘you’ is US.

March 14th, 2005 by Andrew

Post-modern Jesus Christ

I was just about to grab a beer and get in the shower, when the Z Mas­ter sent this lit­tle jewel down the line. An alter­na­tive view of Jesus, if he drove a cab and smoked cheap cig­ars, just another immi­grant with a twisted per­spec­tive and delu­sions of ade­quacy. Makes us all pine for the good ‘ol days of reli­gion, when it was fresh and new, when the lie wasn’t so ripe and you could still get caught in the fer­vor, have a reli­gious expe­ri­ence with­out being born-again. Nowa­days, the think­ing man has cat-like reflexes against any­thing resem­bling a deity, but back then, to get in on the ground-floor of a world-changing move­ment, that was the gen­e­sis of cool.

Jesus was just a kid with a tumor who heard voices and could guess your weight at the car­ni­val. He had a secret club and a sym­bol, and pretty soon every­one wanted in. Add a quick dose of mod­ern per­spec­tive and it all seems so passè. There hasn’t been any­thing excit­ing since Luther lay down his ham­mer. (As an aside… does that ham­mer still exist? I should like to own it. And I also think that Luther needed a good edi­tor. 95 the­ses? Its just exces­sive. Way to beat a dead horse, Luther)

What churches should have, how­ever, is a Sug­ges­tion Box. But can you imagine?

Hindu : “I think the Vishnu needs more arms.“
Jew­ish : “But really, what are we wait­ing for?“
Chris­tan : “But, it really does look like a big ‘t’.“
Islamic : “I like the new mul­lah but, he really isn’t much to ulu­late about.”

Just remem­ber: Reli­gion needs a god to exist, but a god does not need a religion.

March 2nd, 2005 by Andrew

Blas­phemy

I’ve always con­sid­ered God as more of a DC comics fan. I mean, look at Super­man, he could have writ­ten that entire story himself.

Comes from the heav­ens. Where he is the son of a pow­er­ful leader that no one lis­tens to any­more.
Super pow­ers sim­i­lar to Jesus. He brings Lois Lane back from the dead… very Jesus-esque.
Con­stantly sav­ing the Earth. And he’s the only one who can.
Lois Lane/Mary Mag­da­lene. The divine’s con­cu­bine.
Jimmy/Peter. Always mess­ing some­thing up, but heart in the right place.
And Star­ring Lex Luthor as the Devil. The Devil is always mak­ing him­self into an Angel of Light. Or puts on a nice suit with dia­mond cufflinks.

How­ever, Jesus’s skin could be pierced. That’s the main difference.

Joseph Cambpell would be with me on this one, I’m sure. Super­man is a clear mod­ern para­lell to the story of Christ. With the “God of the Gaps” quickly dis­ap­pear­ing, and Niet­zsche famously wrote his/her obit­u­ary, our cul­ture has evolved to address the need for the the hero epic with sci­ence — and sci­ence fiction.

Camp­bell, Joseph. The Hero with a Thou­sand Faces. 1949.